Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rubenser v. Felice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1961No. 35906Published

1DissentWeaver, J.

(dissenting)—

“In deáling with the Rule in Shelley’s case it is very easy to become antiquarian. The deeper you go into it, the more tantalizing its puzzles become; indeed, one can foresee, and perhaps envy, the scholar who some day will escape from a troubled world and devote his life to writing the definitive work on the Rule. Done with insight and imagination it *867could be as great as Gibbon’s ‘Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.’ ” Casner and Leach: Cases and Text on Property (1st ed. 1951) 363.

The challenge is interesting, but the basis of this dissent will be limited to three…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shufeldt v. ShufeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cooper v. RunnelsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Thurston v. AllenHawaii Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Richardson v. DansonWashington Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API