Legal Opinion

Crist v. Fife

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1919No. Civ. No. 2816PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This suit is one for the rescission of a contract for the purchase of certain residence property, the cancellation of a note and mortgage given as part payment therefor, and the recovery of money paid thereon.

The complaint charged that respondents had falsely and knowingly and with intent to deceive appellants represented that the title to the property was free and clear of all encumbrances of every kind, and that appellants relied upon these representations, whereas there were in fact certain building restrictions against the property. The trial court found that the claimed representations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. EigermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Polak v. MattsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salton Community Services District v. SouthhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Block v. Citizen Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Osborne v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API