Legal Opinion

Smith v. Eigerman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1892No. 567PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Starke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

This action was brought by Fredericka Eigerman against Smith and wife for the breach of a special covenant against encumbrances contained in a deed of conveyance. The deed was executed on the 11th day of September, 1890, and contains the following covenant: “ The said Edwin K. 'Smith, party of the first part, for himself, his heirs, executors and administrators, doth covenant, promise and agree to and with the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, that he has not done or suffered to be done anything whereby the said premises hereby granted are or may be in any manner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Cole v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Block v. Citizen Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Levine v. HullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  3. Polak v. MattsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Crist v. FifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Osborne v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API