Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 27, 2010No. Criminal 09-202-P-HPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON SENTENCING ISSUE

D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.

Congress enacted the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 to “restore fairness to Federal cocaine sentencing.” 1 Its most notable provision increases the amount of crack cocaine necessary to trigger mandatory five- and ten-year sentences. That change will reduce the current dramatic disparity in mandatory crack cocaine and powder cocaine sentences.

The issue in this case is whether the new provision that lowers the mandatory sentencing floors applies to a defendant who has not yet been sentenced, but who engaged in crack cocaine…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. Dennis HarotunianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. ReeveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GoncalvesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. BaptistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API