Legal Opinion

Phathong v. Tesco Corporation (US)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 6, 2014No. 12-1455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Von J. Phathong was seriously injured while working on a drilling rig in Garfield County, Colorado. Phathong sued Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), the operator of the drilling rig, alleging a Colorado state-law claim for negligence. 1 Prior to trial, Tesco sought summary judgment on the ground it was immune from common-law negligence liability because, inter alia, it was Phathong’s statutory employer under the provisions of Colorado’s Workers’ Compensation Act. See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 8411-401. The district court denied Tesco’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Liebert Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Finlay v. Storage Technology Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Buzard v. Super Walls, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Enriquez-Chavez v. Dillon Companies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API