Legal Opinion
Lovell v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 25, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for a fall upon a sidewalk in the defendant city, and from a judgment entered upon a verdict in her favor the defendant has appealed. The sidewalk in question consisted of concrete slabs; a large tree stood in the half of the sidewalk nearer the curb, and the slab which surrounded it, irrgular in shape, was broken and displaced; and a slab in the other half was somewhat displaced and broken along its edge, running across the line of the walk, where it met the adjoining slab. All the claims of error are addressed to the charge of the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Horton v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Kristiansen v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Rogers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Bjorkman v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Older v. Town of Old LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Tirendi v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Sellew v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Jager v. First National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Cote v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.