Legal Opinion

United States v. Mancinas-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 2, 2009No. 16-56015PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on December 2, 2009, is amended as follows:

588 F.3d p. 681, Section II, ¶ 1, line 7. Delete “(en banc)”.

588 F.3d p. 682, ¶ 3, lines 8-9. Delete the parenthetical “, sitting en banc,”.

OPINION

ADELMAN, District Judge:

A Phoenix grand jury indicted defendant Bernardo Mancinas-Flores for a variety of offenses arising out of defendant’s involvement in smuggling undocumented aliens into the United States and holding them for ransom in a stash house. On the morning the trial was to begin, defendant decided to enter into a plea agreement with the government pursuant to which he…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. David RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Derrick Loftis v. AlmagerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. MARTIN v. PHILLIPSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. United States v. Cynthia MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API