United States v. Mancinas-Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on December 2, 2009, is amended as follows:
588 F.3d p. 681, Section II, ¶ 1, line 7. Delete “(en banc)”.
588 F.3d p. 682, ¶ 3, lines 8-9. Delete the parenthetical “, sitting en banc,”.
OPINION
ADELMAN, District Judge:
A Phoenix grand jury indicted defendant Bernardo Mancinas-Flores for a variety of offenses arising out of defendant’s involvement in smuggling undocumented aliens into the United States and holding them for ransom in a stash house. On the morning the trial was to begin, defendant decided to enter into a plea agreement with the government pursuant to which he…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. David RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Derrick Loftis v. AlmagerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- MARTIN v. PHILLIPSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- United States v. Cynthia MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.