Legal Opinion

Grider v. Manisera

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1936No. Civ. 10783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

In these two eases, consolidated for trial, plaintiff, an aged widow, recovered judgments for the return of certain properties which she had transferred to her daughter and granddaughter. The transfers were made, it was alleged, because of the coercion and insistence of the transferees and upon representations that if such conveyances were not made "other persons” would seize said properties. It was also alleged and found that said transferees promised to reconvey the properties to plaintiff upon demand, but had failed and refused so to do.

No sufficient legal reason is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Anderson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Fowler v. EnriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Young v. the Young Holdings Corp., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Karallis v. ShenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Chambers v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API