Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1927No. Docket No. 4680PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, the plaintiffs having declined to amend.

Concisely stated, the material allegations of the questioned pleading, assuming them for the purposes of the demurrer to be true, were substantially as follows: The defendant Roy M. Nelson was the son of Richard C. Nelson, who in his lifetime, and especially on or about March 15, 1922, was the owner of certain real and personal property; he was sixty-five years of age, and was suffering from kidney complaint and paralysis which partially disabled him,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Rozell v. VansyckleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Peck v. BrummagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Cunningham v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tognazzi v. WilhelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. DeBoer v. DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Young v. the Young Holdings Corp., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Saint v. SaintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API