Legal Opinion

Mohl v. NTC of America, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided November 29, 1982No. 82-K-449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 56, F.R. Civ.P. or, in the alternative, to strike defendant NTC of America, Inc.’s 12th affirmative defense. The 12th affirmative defense says:

“The liability, if any, of Defendant is limited by the agreement of the parties, and/or the value declared by the Plaintiff, as provided in 49 U.S.C. § 10730.”

In this action under the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11707, plaintiff Foremost and defendant NTC each seek to protect themselves from liability for the damage caused to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Adams v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Mode O'Day Corp. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Auto Driveaway Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. United States v. Auto Driveaway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2003
  2. Colorado Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CAT Continental, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance v. Auto Driveaway Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Farmington Casualty Co. v. United Educators Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
  5. Kunz v. Colorado Ass'n of Soil Conservation Districts Medical Benefits PlanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API