Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1980No. Civ. 54411PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Petitioner County of Los Angeles (County) contends respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) erred in the method it calculated a 10 percent penalty against County pursuant to Labor Code section 5814 1 for County’s unreasonable delay in providing permanent disability payments to respondent injured worker, Charles Crowe. In light of Gallamore v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 23 Cal.3d 815 [153 Cal.Rptr. 590, 591 P.2d 1242], we find merit to County’s contention.

I

The issue here is not whether a penalty should be assessed but rather how the 10 percent penalty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Adams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Davison v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Ramsey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Griffith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Consani v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Burton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Toccalino v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API