Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2007PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

This is an appeal by the City of Philadelphia (City) from a grievance arbitration conducted pursuant to what is commonly referred to as Act 111, 1 in which the arbitrator found in favor of the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5(FOP). The City failed to respond to the arbitrator’s subpoena that was issued at the request of the FOP, claiming that it had misplaced the subpoena and that it had not intentionally failed to respond. The arbitrator, in large measure based on instances in other, unrelated cases between the two parties in which the City had apparently…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Town of McCandless v. McCandless Police Officers Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Browne v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Town of McCandless v. McCandless Police Officers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Borough of Montoursville v. Montoursville Police Bargaining UnitCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. A. Acosta v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Borough of Montoursville v. Montoursville Police Bargaining UnitCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API