Legal Opinion · Dissent

Unified School District No. 446 v. Sandoval

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 31, 2012No. 101,145Published

1DissentNuss, C.J.

The uncontrov-erted facts establish the parties entered into a binding oral contract on March 10, 2008.

Binding Oral Contract

It is uncontroverted that on March 10, the Board of Education of Unified School District No. 446 was in executive session considering whether that night it would either (1) pass a resolution to nonrenew Deborah Sandoval’s teaching contract for the upcoming school year or (2) allow her to voluntarily leave its employ via a negotiated settlement. It is further uncontroverted that offers and counteroffers were exchanged until Sandoval eventually accepted the board’s “last…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Stoldt v. City of TorontoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. State v. Sanchez-LoredoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Nungesser v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API