Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 20, 1981No. 1 CA-IC 2392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Judge.

This is a special action brought to review an Industrial Commission award which determined it had no jurisdiction over petitioner’s claim for Arizona benefits on the grounds that the petitioner was not hired in Arizona. We agree with the Commission’s determination.

The facts are viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the administrative award and the award must be sustained if reasonably supported by the evidence. Mi-cucci v. Industrial Commission, 108 Ariz. 194, 494 P.2d 1324 (1972).

The petitioner is and has been a resident of Tucson, Arizona. He was injured in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Knack v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City Products Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Baker v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colson v. Avnet, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  2. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. DiMuro v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Sherring v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API