Legal Opinion

Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 18, 1981No. 1 CA-IC 2312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

Larry Giles, a resident of Arizona, was hired by Saudi Maintenance Co., Ltd., to work as a water well foreman in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. While on the job there, he was injured and thereafter filed a claim for workmen’s compensation in Arizona. Saudi Maintenance Co., unsuccessfully contested the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission over the claim and now brings this review in the court of appeals raising two basic questions: (1) whether Giles was hired in Arizona, and (2) whether the Industrial Commission has the power to subject Saudi Maintenance Co., to its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Aramco Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Fausnet v. State Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API