Legal Opinion

Boulding v. Slick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1932No. 21202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The record shows that Perryman Cudjo and - R. L. M. Blalcemore and Robert Jones, his attorneys in fact, by written agreement in which they were the parties of the first part, employed one R. P. Boulding, an attorney, to prosecute a certain suit or action at law in their behalf to quiet title in them to certain real estate situated in Seminole county, Olcla., and that they agreed to pay him all legitimate expenses of the suit and “allow” him “a sum equal to an undivided one-half of any and all sums recovered by virtue of the ownership of the parties of the first part in and to said lands,” the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ShirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Lyons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Western States Oil & Land Co. v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Schlessinger v. Forest Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Kincaid v. Black Angus Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. City of Barnsdall v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Jones v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API