Legal Opinion

American Colortype Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 23, 1939No. C. D. 107PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

In this suit against the United States the plaintiff claims that certain paintings are free of duty as “original paintings in oil” under paragraph 1807 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and are not dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1547 as “Works of art, including (1) paintings in off” as classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York.

A director and export manager of the importing firm was called as a witness by the plaintiff and produced three prints or reproductions of the three paintings herein involved, which were received in evidence and marked…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitman Publishing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. St. John v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Protest 71898-K of Duttons, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API