Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hedahl's-Q B & R, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1971No. Civ. 8595PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

This case comes to us on appeal with a demand for a trial de novo from the judgment of the district court establishing the value of certain stock in a closely held corporation at $230 per share. The case arose under Section 10-20-08, N.D.C.C., when John Quanrud, on his own behalf and acting through a power |of attorney on behalf of his sister, Helen Quanrud Brown, dissented from a merger of Quan-rud, Brink & Reibold, Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as Q B & R), of which they were- shareholders, and Hedahl’s, Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as He-dahl’s, Inc.).

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Application of Delaware Racing AssociationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Application of Delaware Racing Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  3. In Re the General Realty & Utilities Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  4. Sporborg v. City Specialty Stores, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  5. Felder v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tome Land & Improvement Co. v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wald v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API