Buckley v. County of Marin
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Marin County granting a new trial and an order denying a motion for judgment on special finding. George H. Buck, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action commenced by plaintiff, as assignee of the Dundon Bridge and Construction Company, against the county of Marin, and arises out of a contract entered into between the said company and defendant for the construction of a bridge across the tidal channel separating Belvedere from Tiburón in said county. Two causes of action are set forth in the complaint: 1. To recover the sum of seven thousand dollars, the contract price for the work described in the complaint. 2. To recover the reasonable value of the work done, not to exceed the sum of seven thousand dollars.
It is alleged in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Santa Cruz v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Golden Gate Lumber Co. v. SahrbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tone v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Associated Fruit Co. v. MaroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924