Quinn v. Webb Wheel Products
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Olly Neal, Judge.
This is the second appeal to this court of this workers’ compensation matter. In Quinn v. Webb Wheel, 52 Ark. App. 208, 915 S.W.2d 740 (1996), we remanded for the Commission’s consideration, the appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-201 (Repl. 1996). On remand, the Commission held that the composition of the Commission does not deny claimants due process of law. In the present appeal, appellant contends that Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-201, must be found unconstitutional because the manner in which the Workers’ Compensation Commission members are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Long v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Quinn v. Webb Wheel ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Stiger v. State Line Tire ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Lunday v. Entergy Arkansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.