Coyle Crete, LLC v. Nevins
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Coyle Crete, LLC, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Kathleen Nevins. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether its claims were barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Mindful of the procedural posture of the case, we set forth the following facts as gleaned from the pleadings, affidavits and other proof submitted, viewed in a light most…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Cannizzaro v. MarinyakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Medical Device Solutions, LLC v. AferzonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Marques v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Doran v. First Connecticut Capital, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.