Legal Opinion

Tassone v. Haggar Apparel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and third-party complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. The 1996 amendment to Workers’ Compensation Law § 11 (see, L 1996, ch 635, § 2) does not apply retroactively to bar the third-party action (see, Regensdorfer v Central Buffalo Project Corp., 247 AD2d 931, 933; Massella v Partner Indus. Prods., 242 AD2d 870). Further, the release given by Vincent Tassone (plaintiff) to third-party defendant does not relieve…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Armac Industries, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Regensdorfer v. Central Buffalo Project Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Massella v. Partner Industrial Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trzaska v. Cincinnati, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API