Trzaska v. Cincinnati, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and affirmative defenses based upon General Obligations Law § 15-108 reinstated. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries that he sustained in a work-related accident. The injuries occurred when he was setting up a brake machine allegedly manufactured by Cincinnati, Inc. and sold by Pitney Bowes, Inc. (defendants). Cincinnati, Inc. commenced a third-party action against plaintiffs employer. While the third-party action was pending, plaintiff entered into a settlement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ward v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Madaffari v. Wilmod Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Bauman v. GarfinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Tassone v. Haggar Apparel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Hedman Resources Ltd. v. Occidental Chem. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026