Legal Opinion

Trzaska v. Cincinnati, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and affirmative defenses based upon General Obligations Law § 15-108 reinstated. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries that he sustained in a work-related accident. The injuries occurred when he was setting up a brake machine allegedly manufactured by Cincinnati, Inc. and sold by Pitney Bowes, Inc. (defendants). Cincinnati, Inc. commenced a third-party action against plaintiffs employer. While the third-party action was pending, plaintiff entered into a settlement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Madaffari v. Wilmod Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bauman v. GarfinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Tassone v. Haggar Apparel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Hedman Resources Ltd. v. Occidental Chem. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API