Legal Opinion

Regensdorfer v. Central Buffalo Project Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: *932Supreme Court erred in denying the cross motion of defendant and third-party plaintiff, Central Buffalo Project Corporation (Central Buffalo), and the motion of third-party defendant, United States Shoe Corporation, doing business as Casual Corner (Casual Corner), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “It is well settled that an out-of-possession landlord who relinquishes control of the premises and is not contractually obligated to repair unsafe conditions is not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Putnam v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Velazquez v. Tyler Graphics, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Quinones v. 27 Third City King Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Gelardo v. ASMA Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ferro v. BurtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Davison v. WiggandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Sauer v. ManninoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Sauve v. WinfreeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gronski v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API