Legal Opinion

Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 1, 2008No. Civil Action 04-2202 (CKK)PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Ralph Schoenman, a political activist and author, filed the above-captioned action pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act of 1974 (“Privacy Act” or “PA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552a, seeking access to an array of records pertaining to himself, Lord Bertrand Russell, and six organizations, from a total of ten different named agencies and a number of unnamed agencies to which the named agencies might refer documents for a determination as to releasability (identified as “John Doe Agencies…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Beltranena v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Comptel v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Lewis v. Executive Office for United State AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Holt v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API