Taylor v. Soper
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Jackson. (Gridley, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against defendant for the breach of an alleged verbal warranty. The warranty consisted in stating that a certain note which plaintiff was offered as part of the purchase price of a farm the plaintiff was selling to defendant’s son was as good as gold, or as good as money. The note was in fact worthless. The circuit judge instructed the jury that the statement, if anything, was a guaranty of the collection of the note, and that it became necessary for the plaintiff to pursue such remedies as the law afforded him to enforce the collection from the maker of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Swenson v. StoltzWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Taylor v. BunkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Burtch v. Child, Hulswit & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Knauss v. MajorMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Clark v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.