Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bunker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Gridley, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This case was before us in the January term, 1884, and is reported in 53 Mich. 96 (18 N. W. Rep. 570), under the title of Taylor v. Soper. The judgment was then reversed, and a new trial ordered. Since that time the declaration has by leave of court been amended. Before trial, the defendant, Soper, died, and the suit was revived and continued against Bunker, as administrator of Soper’s estate.

Upon the trial of the cause, the plaintiff was sworn as a witness in his own behalf, and was interrogated as to what *259occurred between himself and the defendant’s intestate relative to the purchase by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Taylor v. SoperMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Barker v. HebbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Michels v. Western Underwriters' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hutchinson v. ClearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API