Legal Opinion
BSC v. Natrona County Department of Family Services
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 2004No. C-04-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[11] Pro se Appellant BSC appeals from the district court's order terminating his parental rights to CC. He claims that the district court erred by refusing to appoint an attorney to represent him and by refusing to continue the termination hearing after learning that BSC had ingested medication which could affect his ability to defend himself. BSC also claims Appellee Natrona County Department of Family Services (DFS) failed to follow its legal obligations to notify him when it took CC into custody. We conclude that clear and convincing evidence was presented at the hearing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re ADWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re WdwWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- JLW v. CABWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- C.L. v. Wyoming Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.