Legal Opinion
Saline Valley Salt Co. v. White
California Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1918No. L. A. No. 5364PublishedCited by 4 opinions
ORIGINAL proceedings by a corporation and stockholders for a Writ of Mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George J. Denis, Oliver O. Clark, and Claud B. Andrews, for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An original application for a writ of mandate was made to the district court of appeal of the second appellate district, and after a hearing a peremptory writ was granted in accordance with the prayer of the petition. Afterward the matter was transferred to this court.
In the opinion of the learned district court of appeal the essential facts and one of the principal questions are set forth as follows:
“In this proceeding the petitioners seek to compel the delivery to them by the respondents of the papers and records of petitioner corporation. The controversy is between rival sets of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riverside Land Co. v. JarvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Lum v. American Wheel & Vehicle Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- People Ex Rel. Miller v. . CummingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People's Home Savings Bank v. Superior Court of the City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cheney v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casady v. Modern Metal Spinning & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Scott v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Qarni v. VahoraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2019