Legal Opinion

Hedge v. Lyng

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1988No. Civ. 4-86-610Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Farmers Sam Hedge, Jim Stengrim, William Decker, and Lowell Nelson bring this action as representatives of a class of farmers. They seek injunctive and declaratory relief against the Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator and Minnesota State Director of the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). Plaintiffs challenge the legitimacy of regulations governing FmHA County Commissioner elections and 1986 elections held under those regulations. The second amended complaint alleges violations of the Food Security Act of 1985, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API