Legal Opinion
People v. Sorenson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his sentence, which was to run consecutively to the sentences previously imposed upon the defendant’s convictions in an unrelated manslaughter case (People v Sorenson, 225 AD2d 566 [decided herewith]) was not excessive (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [1]; People v Rivera, 131 AD2d 892). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SorensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. KarimzadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008