Legal Opinion
People v. Sorenson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. The People also disproved his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Campbell, 70 NY2d 724). The People presented, inter *567alia, the testimony of eyewitnesses who identified the defendant as the driver of a blue, four-door Oldsmobile, the same type of car involved in this hit-and-run accident. More particularly the defendant was seen driving the car at an excessive speed, at about the time of the incident…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BigelowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. AullaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SorensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- People v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.