M. & J. Finance Corp. v. Rinehardt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
In this case the plaintiff made numerous objections and exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence, which we have carefully examined and are unable to sustain.
The main contentions of the plaintiff relate to the instructions to the jury, the more serious of which contentions, as we gather from the oral •argument and the brief, are addressed to the instructions about “fraud in the treaty” and “fraud in the factum,” and the bearing of each, if found, upon the rights of parties. There can be no point in numbering these exceptions in this opinion, since they are not set out above in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Medlin v. . BufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Nicholls v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
- Security Finance Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. Real Property Located at 5201 Woodlake DriveDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
- AUTO FINANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Overstreet v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990