Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Craighead County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

There are two consolidated actions involved in this appeal, one against the defendant, St. Louis-San Francisco Bailway Company, and the other against the Missouri Pacific Bailroad Company, each instituted in the chancery court of Craighead County by the Attorney General, in the name of the State of Arkansas, for the use and benefit of Craighead County, to recover delinquent county taxes due for the years 1921 and 1922.

It is alleged in the complaint that all property in Craighead County was assessed, for all purposes other than for county taxation, at fifty per centum of its actual value, so…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Prout v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Unborn Child Amendment Committee v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Paschal v. MunseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Arkansas Ex Rel. Utley v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API