Legal Opinion
Arkansas Ex Rel. Utley v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 23, 1925No. 74PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Two separate suits, consolidated in the trial court, were brought by plaintiff in error in the Chancery Court for the Western District of Craighead County, Arkansas, pursuant to statute (§ 10,204, et seq. of Crawford & Moses Digest) to recover from the defendants overdue county taxes assessed against them for the years 1921-1922.
The assessments in question purport to have been made in compliance with a peremptory writ of mandamus issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The Maccabees, an incorporated ■fraternal order, relator in the mandamus proceeding,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Prout v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. Fort ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States ex rel. Fall City Const. Co. v. JimmersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kersh Lake Drainage District v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Arkla, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. Kersh Lake Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Sholtz v. United States ex rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- City of Wheeling v. John F. Casey Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.