Legal Opinion

Manhattan Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1914No. 11510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered May 24, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action upon a surety bond, executed by the defendant O. W. Lindsley as principal, and the defendant The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety, to secure the faithful performance of a building-contract on the part of Lindsley. A trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants, from which the defendant Guaranty Company has appealed.

On March 16, 1912, the defendant Lindsley entered into a contract, in writing, with respondent, Manhattan Company,, *406whereby he agreed to furnish all labor for, and to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monro v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. James Black Masonry & Contracting Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Leghorn v. NydellWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Leiendecker v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Peters v. MackayWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  2. Corporation of President of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. John Dower Lumber Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Finne v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. City of Tacoma v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API