Legal Opinion

Leghorn v. Nydell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1905No. 5092PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered December 23, 1903, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, after a trial on tbe merits before tbe court without a jury, in an action upon an indemnity bond.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Curiam.—On

On tbe 12th day of June, 1902, tbe defendant Nydell, as contractor, entered into a contract with the plaintiff, Leghorn, as owner, for the construction of a building, in tbe city of Seattle, for the contract price of $3,999. Tbe contract provided that tbe building should be completed on or before October 1, 1902, and that tbe contractor should pay tbe owner $3 for each day’s delay in tbe completion of tbe building after said 1st day of October, 1902, as liquidated damages. On tbe date of the execution of tbe contract, tbe defendant Nydell and tbe defendant Aetna…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Speck v. FinegoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. United Surety Co. v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Lackland v. EdwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Monro v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. James Black Masonry & Contracting Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API