Legal Opinion

Leiendecker v. Aetna Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1909No. 7556PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered January 81, 1908, upon granting a nonsuit, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action upon an indemnity bond.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

On the 12th of October, 1906, plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant Harry B. Spear, doing business as Spear & Co., whereby Spear, in consideration of the sum of $1,000, agreed to build an apartment house and to do certain other work for plaintiff on real property belonging to plaintiff, in the city of Seattle. This was a written contract, which we will not set forth here, but which embodied the agreement we have mentioned. At the time the *610contract was entered into, it was agreed orally between plaintiff and Spear that the payment of $7,000 for the aforesaid work should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. McGregorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Miller v. EcclesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gail Michelman v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. James Black Masonry & Contracting Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Cornish College v. 1000 Virginia Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API