Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dengel v. Hartmann

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 1, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeedy, J.

This case, coming to the writer on reassignment, is an original proceeding in prohibition, by which relator seeks to prohibit the respondent judge from enforcing a certain subpoena duces tecum. The subpoena, ordered issued by respondent, was directed to, and served upon the Secretary of the Board of Election Commissioners of the City of St. Louis,, and commanded him to produce and bring with him "for examination, inspection, and comparison” by the grand jury o'f the division of the circuit court presided over by the respondent judge, then in session, the ballot boxes, ballots, registration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chaney v. GrinsteadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Hollman v. McElhinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Cartright v. McDonald CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Dorsey v. SpragueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Jacobsmeyer v. ThatcherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Pogue v. SwinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. State ex rel. Washington State Sportsmen's Council, Inc. v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Totton v. MurdockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API