Legal Opinion
Swalley v. Addressograph Multigraph Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 31, 1946No. 8842PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for commissions alleged to be due him for services rendered to the defendant as sales agent for the sale of the defendant’s products, including multigraph and multilith machines and attachments, in a territory comprising the State of Alabama and some counties in northern Florida.
On March 25, 1941 a written contract was entered into to be effective as of March 6, 1941 and terminable at the will of either party. Section 8 of the contract is controlling and is set forth in the footnote.1
*53By this section it was provided that if any machines or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Curtiss Candy Co. v. SilbermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Chick v. MacBainSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Trainer v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Flint v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Richard Miller, United States of America v. Fenton Leon Bash and Samuel WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Garber v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Moody v. BogueCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
- Paul C. Gebhard v. Royce Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Cascade Auto Glass v. PROGRESSIVE CAS. INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.