Paul C. Gebhard v. Royce Aluminum Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This diversity action by a salesman for commissions contains a saga of alleged overreaching, much of which we nee.d not detail. The question is, who did what, and to whom. The trial court felt that the plaintiff was the significant offender, disagreeing with the jury, and directed a verdict for the defendant un der Rule 50(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. Plaintiff appeals.
On April 9, 1956, plaintiff wrote a letter to Royce Aluminum Corporation, defendant-appellee, purporting to “recap” the oral agreement they had reached on April 3 under which plaintiff was to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flint v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Lyman Loring Brooks v. GregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Swalley v. Addressograph Multigraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Norton v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Globe Paper Co. v. Russell Box Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Garber v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Janda v. Iowa Industrial Hydraulics, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Stieber v. Journal Publishing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.