Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 6, 2014No. 13-946PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion *1 PER CURIAM.

When a state prisoner seeks federal habeas relief on the ground that a state court, in adjudicating a claim on the merits, *2 misapplied federal law, a federal court may grant relief only if the state court's decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1). We have emphasized, time and again, that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 110 Stat. 1214 , prohibits the federal courts of appeals from relying on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Brumfield v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Johnny L. Marshall v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Michael Wade Nance v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Rebecca Shimel v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API