Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 15, 1976No. 7618SC571PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Appellant was charged with violating G.S. 20-138 (a) and convicted of violating G.S. 20-138 (b). The statute itself provides :
“(a) It is unlawful . . . for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or operate any vehicle upon any highway . . . within this State.
“ (b) It is unlawful for any person to operate any vehicle upon any highway . . . within this State when the amount of alcohol in such person’s blood is 0.10 percent or more by weight .... An offense under this subsection shall be treated as a lesser included offense of the offense of driving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . McBrayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Armstrong v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. WattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.