Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wallace

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 1, 1982PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

After taking chlordiazepoxide, 1 a medication prescribed by his physician, the defendant was involved in an automobile accident. At his trial on complaints charging him with operating a motor vehicle “while under the influence of” drugs (G. L. c. 90, § 24[l][a] 2 ) and with operating “a [motor] vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered” (G. L. c. 90, § 24[2] [a] 3 ), the defendant was precluded, on objection by the Commonwealth, from introducing evidence that he had no knowledge of the effects of the medication and that he had not received warnings…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. SherryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. AlvarezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. RAMOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. CoteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. CollierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API