Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Underwriters at Lloyds London
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 12, 1961No. 3416PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRED M. TAYLOR, District Judge.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover on a policy of insurance issued by defendant Underwriters at Lloyds London (Lloyds) through defendant Haidinger-Hayes, Inc. Federal jurisdiction is invoked on the basis of diversity of citizenship with the amount in controversy exceeding $10,000. Plaintiff was unable to obtain service on defendant Haidinger-Hayes, Inc. within the jurisdiction of this Court and therefore the action against this defendant was dismissed without prejudice. The remaining parties have submitted this matter for the Court’s determination on a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Travelers Protective Assn. of America v. PrinsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mary G. Bruce, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter B. Bruce, Deceased v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Conner v. Union Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- MacAlco, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Insurance Company of North America v. CashTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- South Carolina Insurance v. Collins Ex Rel. Estate of CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.