Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1995No. CR 94-1068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Carl Stewart, by his counsel Hugh Finkelstein, asks to file a belated brief in his appeal of a criminal conviction. The brief was due December 12, 1994. It was tendered December 15, 1994. Mr. Finkelstein offers a litany of reasons, all of which amount to nothing more than saying he put off “finalizing” the brief until the last day when his schedule went awry. Although he says the delay was due to circumstances beyond his control, the facts he states show only mismanagement and failure to anticipate possible variances in court scheduling of unrelated matters in which he was involved after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Mosley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Wertz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API