Legal Opinion

Hallman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1985No. CR 85-153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney J.F. Atkinson, Jr., moves this court to accept a brief on behalf of his client, Michael Hallman. The brief was due on November 1,1985, and was tendered seven days late. We accept the brief because we do not wish the appellant to suffer loss of this criminal appeal because of Mr. Atkinson’s negligence. The only excuse offered is that the record is large. Mr. Atkinson notes in his motion that he is a court appointed attorney in this case. We wish particularly to emphasize that the professional obligations of attorneys appointed by the court are the same as those of all others…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Betts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API