Whited v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
1. It is conceded that the nonsuit is based on the proposition that the evidence, both direct and circumstantial, is insufficient to show that the bottle of Coca-Cola purchased by the plaintiff through the vending machine was a bottle of Coca-Cola sold by the defendant to 'the Downtown Chevrolet Company’s vending machine. Let us first see the pleadings regarding this issue. Paragraph 3 of the petition pertaining to this issue alleges: “That the defendant did, on the date set out hereafter, or some date prior, thereto, deliver such sealed bottles of Coca-Cola in a quantity ¡to. a place of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chambley v. Apple Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Gazaway v. SECURED INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Hall v. Sidney Clotfelter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Chambley v. Apple Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Chambley v. Apple Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.