Beinhorn v. Saraceno
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff instituted an action for false arrest against the defendant. From the judgment rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff has appealed claiming that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury regarding the plaintiffs burden of proof to establish a lack of probable cause for her arrest, (2) submitted interrogatories to the jury regarding matters of law, and (3) precluded the plaintiff from offering rebuttal evidence. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could have reasonably found the following facts. On the evening…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- McHale v. W.B.S. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. FrankoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Lo Sacco v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Walczyk v. RioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Russo v. City Of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Russo v. City of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Davis v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Davis v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.