Legal Opinion

United States v. Sterling

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 8, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThacher, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The suit is properly brought in equity, since recovery is sought of funds received and held by Sterling as trustee, and alleged to have been paid to the Commercial Trust Company contrary to the provisions of the trust. By the terras of the trust the freight moneys were to be held for account “of whoever may be found entitled to them.” The claim of the Commercial Trust Company rests upon an assignment of unearned freights, made by the agreed purchasers of the vessels, who never acquired title. The effect of such an assignment is quite clearly established by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. Freights of the KateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
  2. United States v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
  3. Merchants' Banking Co. v. Cargo of the AftonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  4. Carpenter v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. In re Atlantic, G. & P. S. S. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Lines (S.A.), Inc. v. United States (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. United States Lines (S.A.), Inc. v. United States (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. American President Lines, Ltd. v. Lykes Bros. SteamshipDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
  4. In Re McLean Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Ambassador Factors, Division Fleet Factors Corp. v. First American Bulk Carrier Corp. (In re Topgallant Lines, Inc.)District Court, D. Georgia · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API